Evaluation: BetaFPV Air65 1S 65mm Tiny Whoop – Elevating the Bar Excessive

It’s been 5 years since BetaFPV launched their final Tiny Whoop, the Meteor65. Now, BetaFPV has lastly unveiled the Air65, a brand new 1S 65mm Tiny Whoop. Designed to cater to each freestyle and racing pilots, the Air65 is available in two flavours, every providing an ultra-lightweight construct and totally different energy techniques to go well with numerous flight kinds. On this evaluate, we’ll dive into the {hardware} and flight efficiency, and see the way it compares to the favored Mobula6 2024. I will even share my customized PID and filter tune for optimized flying expertise.

A few of the hyperlinks on this web page are affiliate hyperlinks. I obtain a fee (at no additional value to you) should you make a purchase order after clicking on one in every of these affiliate hyperlinks. This helps help the free content material for the neighborhood on this web site. Please learn our Affiliate Hyperlink Coverage for extra info.

Listed here are the Tiny Whoop elements and equipment I like to recommend: https://oscarliang.com/best-tiny-whoop/

The place to Purchase?

You will get the BetaFPV Air65 Tiny Whoop from:

There are two variations, freestyle and racing. Undecided which one to get? I’ll speak about it later on this evaluate that can assist you determine.

• Freestyle Version: Options 23000KV motors paired with HQ 31mm Ultralight propellers.
• Racing Version: Geared up with 27000KV motors and GF 1219S-3B propellers.

Opening the BetaFPV Air65 bundle, you’ll discover:

• The Air65 1S 65mm Tiny Whoop drone
• A set of spare propellers
• USB-C Adapter for configuring the drone
• Consumer guide out there on-line by way of a QR code

Word: The battery isn’t included. Get the beneficial BetaFPV LAVA 1S LiHV right here:

Specs

Right here’s a comparability of the BetaFPV Air65 with the earlier Meteor65.

Flight Controller specs:

• MCU: STM32 G473
• Gyro: ICM42688-P
• Helps Betaflight OSD
• 16MB Flash reminiscence for Blackbox logs
• 4 UARTs
• Built-in 5.8GHz 400mW Analog VTX
• Built-in 4-in-1 5A ESC
• Solder pads for motors

Nearer Look

The Air65 boasts an ultra-lightweight design, weighing merely 17.1 grams with out battery, making it one of many lightest BNF tiny whoops I’ve examined thus far. This light-weight design enhances maneuverability and responsiveness.

The drone is available in two variations: Freestyle and Racing, every geared up with totally different KV motors and propellers to go well with numerous flying kinds.

The decrease 23000KV offers you longer flight time (about 30 to 40 seconds extra on common on 1S 300mAh), whereas the 27000KV presents extra energy and responsiveness. If you happen to can’t determine which model to get, I’d advocate the Racing Version. The upper 27000KV motor KV is turning into the brand new normal in tiny whoop racing, making your whoop really feel extra agile and highly effective. If you happen to discover it too quick, you possibly can at all times scale back its energy by setting a decrease motor output restrict or cutting down your throttle.

The C03 FPV digicam presents first rate efficiency in a well-lit environments, nevertheless it won’t be the most effective in low gentle.

The flight controller is the brand new G4 Air FC with a G473 processor and ICM42688P gyro, proving to be dependable in my two weeks of testing. This AIO FC integrates the FC, 4-in-1 ESC, OSD, and 400mW VTX. Nevertheless, it doesn’t have an built-in ExpressLRS receiver, so you will see that an exterior RX mounted on the FC. The Air65 FC presents 4 UARTs, a present sensor, and 16MB reminiscence for Blackbox! These are improbable options to have on a tiny whoop, and really uncommon. I feel this FC is an efficient alternative should you plan to construct a tiny whoop from scratch. The flight controller is offered right here: https://oscarliang.com/product-dhlc.

What’s attention-grabbing is that the USB port can energy the VTX with out a battery! That’s helpful when troubleshooting and organising the drone as you don’t must plug in your battery.

One of many greatest criticisms I’ve concerning the BetaFPV Air65 is its digicam angle. I discover even the bottom digicam angle too excessive, making it exhausting to maneuver indoors in tight areas.

I want the adjustment belt on the rear of the cover was longer and had maybe a few additional holes to permit a decrease angle, which could possibly be useful for learners.

For now, I got here up with a workaround by eradicating the screws on the rear and attaching the cover utilizing a zipper tie. This successfully lowers the digicam angle, with out introducing any vibration or jello, and doesn’t appear to cut back sturdiness both.

Evaluating Air65 to Mobula6 2024

The Mobula6 2024 has been one of the vital in style tiny whoops since its launch earlier this yr. Regardless of some {hardware} and high quality management points, the options and efficiency it presents are simply revolutionary.

The BetaFPV Air65 has its personal points, as talked about on this evaluate, however it does have higher {hardware} high quality management in my view. There are execs and cons to those fashions, and I’ll break them down right here.

Word that the Mobula6 comes with two units of spare props (12 props in whole) whereas the BetaFPV solely comes with one set (8 props in whole). Come on BetaFPV, give us another set! 🙂

Weight

Weighs at solely 17.1g, the Air65 is about 0.5g lighter than the Mobula6, primarily because of the light-weight FC design, which has a extra compact diamond form. BetaFPV additionally changed the USB port with a small plastic JST connector to additional scale back weight. The draw back is that it’s a must to use a USB-C adapter when connecting to Betaflight, which could possibly be annoying for some, however personally, I’ve not discovered that to be a difficulty. You do have to recollect to deliver the adapter with you in case you are touring with the Air65, or else you possibly can’t entry Betaflight Configurator.

Body Design

Body and cover designs are extremely comparable between the BetaFPV Air65 and Mobula6 2024, however the cover plastic used within the Air65 is wider, which contributes to its higher sturdiness. Sturdiness has been a difficulty within the Mobula6, as the cover doesn’t maintain up with in depth use and crashes. To this point, the cover within the Air65 has been holding up rather well for me. The opposite distinction is the digicam mounting, the place the Air65 is friction-mounted within the cover utilizing only one screw, whereas within the Mobula6, the digicam is mounted utilizing two screws on the again of the digicam. This doesn’t appear to make an enormous distinction TBH.

In relation to body and cover, there are a lot of totally different colours you possibly can select from.

Motors

Each the Air65 and Mobula6 use 0702 motors, which is the usual for 65mm tiny whoops these days. The Mobula6 motors have a 28000KV, much like the Air65 Racing Version’s 27000KV, whereas BetaFPV additionally presents the Freestyle Version with a a lot decrease 23000KV.

I actually just like the motors within the Mobula6 as they appear to have extra grip within the air and are barely extra responsive. It’s a refined feeling, however I feel one of many causes behind this could possibly be the magnets – the Mobula6 motors have curved magnets whereas the Air65 simply has common magnets.

Personally I’d advocate the excessive KV model. It’s undoubtedly not probably the most environment friendly, however it’s simply extra highly effective and enjoyable to fly. No matter your flying fashion and ranges, if you wish to go slower, you possibly can at all times decrease the motor output or scale down throttle in Betaflight or in your radio. I’ve a information right here: https://oscarliang.com/reduce-power-throttle-taranis-betaflight/

I discover setting a motor output restrict of round 85% on the 27000KV matches the facility of the 23000KV, however in some way I nonetheless really feel the 27000KV is extra agile.

Battery

The 90-degree angled battery plug of the BetaFPV is such a pleasant contact and certainly extra user-friendly. BetaFPV makes use of BT2.0 connectors, whereas the Mobula6 makes use of A30. Whereas they’re totally different connectors, they’re semi-compatible; it simply takes a bit extra pressure to plug and unplug them. The Mobula6 has a straight connector which places numerous stress on the solder joints when utilizing lengthy 300mAh packs, and the leads are too brief to get the battery within the heart which probably impacts weight distribution.

Between the LAVA 1S 260mAh and 1S 300mAh battery packs, I’d advocate the 300mAh. Though the 260mAh is barely lighter, it noticeably loses punch within the second half of the pack, and the burden saving and improve in flight efficiency isn’t sufficient to justify the flight time loss in my view. I examined these batteries right here: https://oscarliang.com/whoop-toothpick-lipo-battery/#1S-LiPoLiHV

Picture High quality

The FPV digicam within the Air65 works brilliantly in a well-lit setting. When flying at evening with lights on, it clearly outperforms the Mobula6 – it feels brighter, and the picture appears clearer. Nevertheless, in low gentle situations (e.g., in the course of the day with curtains drawn), the Mobula6’s digicam supplies a greater picture than the Air65. I can’t name a transparent winner right here as they excel in numerous lighting situations.

Flight Efficiency

I need to admit, out of the field, the Mobula6 2024 version flew higher with its inventory tune (although it’s on no account the most effective tune and nonetheless has room for enchancment). The Air65 got here with a customized PID/filter tune however it felt free and never as locked in. Nevertheless, after some in-depth tuning, the Air65 can undoubtedly match the efficiency of the Mobula6, if not surpassing it. I’ll put my tuning and settings under on this evaluate so you possibly can attempt it. It flies so significantly better, extra responsive and locked in.

Right here’s the flight instances examined with their default settings (aggressive fashion flying at fixed 50-60% throttle) and their respective hover throttle:

How you can Set Up for First Flight

The FC comes with Betaflight 4.5.0, and the FC goal is BETAFPVG473. You will discover the default CLI diff right here.

Firstly, bind the receiver,

Receiver firmware goal is BETAFPV 2.4GHz Lite RX. Observe this information should you don’t understand how: https://oscarliang.com/bind-expresslrs-receivers/

For maiden flight, listed here are the Betaflight configurations:

1. Load ExpressLRS Preset
2. Set Your Charges
3. Allow Telemetry
4. Set Arm change, angle mode change, turtle mode change
5. Set OSD (disable “Core Temperature” beneath warnings)

Superior Tuning and Settings

If you wish to enhance the Air65’s flight efficiency and have a greater expertise, listed here are my suggestions:

• In Energy & Battery, set Minimal Cell Voltage to three.0V, Warning Cell Voltage to three.2V. Set Scale from 750 to 720 beneath Amperage Meter.
• Cut back Angle power to 90, and even 75 primarily based in your style, 100 simply feels too inflexible.
• Set Angle Restrict to 60 (this principally controls the your roll/pitch stick responsiveness).
• Motor idle 7%.

Reflash Bluejay: They already include Bluejay 0.19 flashed, however with 96KHz PWM Frequency. You’ll be able to flash them to a decrease PWM frequency for extra motor braking energy, which might make the quad extra responsive at the price of flight time. If you happen to endure from vibration points with 24KHz, attempt 48KHz or simply go away it at 96KHz. ESC Firmware Goal: A-X-5.

You’ll get much less flight time when happening in PWM frequency, however the quad will really feel extra responsive and tighter round turns. I feel 48KHz is an efficient stability. Listed here are the typical flight instances with totally different PWM frequencies with 1S 300mAh (fixed 50-60% throttle aggressive flying):

• 96KHz: 4:00
• 48KHz: 3:40
• 24KHz – 2:50

PID Tuning

Word: Depart Motor Output Restrict at 100 for optimum efficiency. I used to be testing numerous values and forgot to set this again to 100 🙂

Filter Tuning:

Cut back RPM filtering:

Set rpm_filter_weights = 100, 60, 0

save

My charges for Angle Mode:

I’m writing a publish on the most effective tiny whoop settings which I’ll publish within the subsequent day or two, keep tuned.

Conclusion

The BetaFPV Air65 1S 65mm Tiny Whoop is a formidable addition to the FPV pastime. Its ultra-lightweight design, highly effective motors, and superior flight controller make it a flexible alternative for pilots of all ability ranges.

You will get the BetaFPV Air65 Tiny Whoop from:

It’s straightforward to arrange and flies effectively. I feel BetaFPV has higher high quality management and {hardware} than the Mobula6, however I’d undoubtedly encourage you to place higher settings and tune on this whoop to optimize efficiency. For me, it’s in all probability the most effective Tiny Whoop in 2024 when it comes to {hardware} and options.