Hello,
I work on structure initiatives, with sketchup 2023, skalp and Structure, on home windows 10.
I often create a number of skp recordsdata:
a fundamental one, which I import in xref then in different recordsdata in order to not have too many scenes per file (as a result of skalp can solely handle a restricted variety of scenes per file).
I’ve a file for the plans, one for the sections and facades, one for the main points, and many others.
Regardless of this, I’ve a daily downside with my scenes (though they don’t seem to be that many): they “skip”, ie the place of the digicam adjustments.
For instance: I click on on the tab of a scene, it takes me correctly to the scene, from there, I stroll round in 3D, then after I click on once more on the tab of this similar scene, typically she seems with a brand new viewpoint. So I’ve to readjust it, which takes quite a lot of time and disrupts my structure displays.
I discover perhaps + the file is complicated, + it’s occurring, however I’m unsure.
I assume it’s a basic bug, however perhaps somebody discovered a means round it?
it could be nice !
Thanks upfront,
Benjamin
How about sharing a file that displays this behaviour in order that others can expertise it or not… and maybe higher enable you to ?
Is that this a query about LayOut 2023? There have been a couple of reviews of digicam place shifting barely in viewports which have the digicam set to Parallel Projection and an ordinary view as you’ll have for plan and elevation views. The LayOut crew are away of this and dealing on an answer.
Are you doing this “stroll round” within the viewport in LayOut?
It’s arduous to inform what you’re actually seeing (and doing) out of your description. Is likely to be that you’re seeing the bug I referred to which isn’t “basic” or it could be one thing you possibly can change in your workflow. As @paul.mcalenan uggested, sharing your file would assist us enable you to.
This absolutely creates much more give you the results you want than it’s best to should be doing. It additionally makes it extra probably you’ll induce errors into your initiatives.
Thanks for such fast solutions !
right here a hyperlink to obtain certainly one of my recordsdata :
the issue occures in sketchup, not in structure :
the scene “strikes” in sketchup, I imply that typically, after I go to a scene in sketchup, the viewpoint will not be anymore the viewpoint I saved. the digicam moved, and I don’t know why.
After that, it grow to be an issue in structure : as a result of the scene modified in sketchup, it adjustments in structure. However I’am positive it’s a sketchup problem.
And I by no means stroll round within the viewport of structure.
I agree with you : quite a lot of recordsdata means quite a lot of work, and I’d like to have just one file, however, right here, it’s a skalp problem :
If I’ve just one file, with a loooot of scenes (50 ? 100 ?), skalp will not be in a position to cope with it :
In structure, if I export my presentation with my 20 ou 30 pages, some scenes will probably be okay, and different wont.
The “dangerous” scenes have this problem : skalp doesnt present the hatches.
And I believe it’s as a result of after I go to a scene in sketchup, sketchup want time to point out skalp hashes, as a result of there are too many scenes. So perhaps Structure simply take the preview of the scene, with out the skalp hashes ?
I assume it’s, as a result of with quite a lot of recordsdata, with a couple of scenes by recordsdata, sketchup doesnt want time to point out skalp hashes, and structure has no downside to export skalp hashes.
Sorry if it’s not likely clear, my english will not be superb…
Thanks once more in your assist
greatest regards,
Benjamin
I’m not seeing any issues with returning to a scene in your mannequin. The scenes aren’t transferring for me. Perhaps it’s one thing Skalp is doing. I had it put in as soon as nevertheless it made extra work for me than it saved so I removed it.
I’m guessing you possibly can drastically scale back the variety of scenes you want for a challenge.
One factor I did discover about your mannequin is the inaccurate tag utilization. I don’t know when you did that or if Skalp did it however that’s sure to trigger you issues.
Perhaps @paul.mcalenan could have time to check out your mannequin file and see one thing totally different.
Like Dave – I’m not noticing something odd as you describe ( I don’t have Skalp )
Thanks in your solutions.
So perhaps my laptop isnt sufficient powerfull !
If you happen to dont use Skalp, you dont use hatches otherwise you do it one other means ?
It’s fairly arduous to scale back the variety of scenes. This challenge is a brand new building however I typically work on rehab initiatives, so I would like the Existant plan, Démolition plan, Projet plan. The identical for the sections, façades…
And there are the main points, the 3D views…
The inaccurate tag utilization imply some edges and faces aren’t on layer 0 ?
How do you verify that ?
Thanks once more !
Benjamin
