Good day, I simply need to be taught a brand new talent, and I preferred recreation VFX very a lot, So I needed to ask, What is less complicated to be taught unity or unreal to do VFX realtime?
I personally imagine that Unity as Shuriken (unity primary particle system) is way simpler than Niagara (unreal present particle system).
Unreal has blueprints although that may be simpler for non-coders.
Although working in each is actually comparable at later phases, so whichever you’ll be taught first you must be capable of change to the opposite moderately rapidly.
1 Like
However I really feel that Graph system is tougher than Niagara proper?
Shuriken particle system will not be graph primarily based (it’s the nice begin with VFX)
VFX Graph is graph primarily based, however you possibly can attempt it later in the event you really feel assured with shuriken
1 Like
In my view, each are simple and complicated to be taught, it could depend upon which one you are feeling extra comfy working in. I might recommend you attempt them each; see which one speaks to you. It’s because you’d additionally need to work with different elements of the engine you finally selected corresponding to their respective materials editor/shader graph.
In Unity, you need to use both the Particle System to create easy results or the VFX Graph to create very complicated results whereas in Unreal you need to use Niagara to create each easy and really complicated results. In Unreal you would want to be taught some easy Blueprint scripting and in Unity, you would need to be taught some primary coding in C#.
Nevertheless, each have their multi-track editors, Unreal/Sequencer and Unity/Timeline which you need to use to indicate off your results at first, so coding/scripting can at all times be learnt later after you could have mastered the particle system of the engine you selected.
So watch a couple of tutorials, take a look at them each and see the one you’re most comfy in.
1 Like
